![]() A part of its users are using it because they are broke and can not afford even an indie license. Or they should give a part of their benefits from this release to Blender Foundation.īlender is free. They should allow Blender to get rid of last operator panel and allow such panel as a tab in Properties Editor. The least that Maxon should morally do is to give something back to Blender’s community. Maxon is not legally constrained to recompense Blender’s community for its intellectual work.īut it is a fact that Maxon is attributing to itself as its intellectual property the work done by volunteers sharing their ideas, here or on right click select. There is nothing surprising that interesting ideas freely shared are adopted by commercial software.īut that would be clearly an unfair behaviour from Maxon to deny that Blender’s 2.8 project was a source of inspiration. With its status of Free Open Source Software, Blender is a natural place for brainstorming of 3D community. I don’t visit Entagma site long time, do they make some suggestion? ![]() Sometime UI design is dictated by software itself. Mean how new interface must look to be good for ALL people. Many people complain about ZBrush UI ( with reason ), but no one have exact idea how this can look. Houdini interface maybe can be “improved” but I think that this is similar situation with ZBrush interface. You don’t go in grocery with 12 wheeler, right?įor mere mortals which do common jobs C4D or Blender geometry nodes are enough in most cases.Īnyway this node stuff are not for me, whatever software are in question. Houdini remain as most powerful software in this field, but not all need this power. And this take less time, effort and technical knowledge. on YouTube easily can find couple C4D channels where people routinely recreate Houdini setups. Instead ( as I hear somewhere ), they look to please Autodesk users, instead to make something, practical, customizable, logical… Even worse, I read couple clever suggestions, but this are attacked, mostly by people without any content in his gallery, in most cases new users. Unfortunately Blender miss opportunity to make more clever design in 2.8. So C4D have good foundation, it’s easy to improve somethin which already are good. In C4D I can do whatever I want… And because all is so well organized I don’t need to memorize tons of shortcuts, to make “custom pie menus” and other trifle. During time I download couple Blender scenes, and because Blender almost always load scene with author custom UI although I uncheck this in menu… I see how different people organize his interface… Mess, pure mess. In Blender I have zero possibility of customization, again Zero ( 0 ), customization. So expectations must be appropriate for this increment update, just like in Blender case.Īlso I have feeling that many C4D users ( current or former ), don’t fully understand Cinema and don’t use it in full potential.Ĭ4D have brilliant design, I can’t stress how much I miss this in Blender. First, this is not full release, more 24.5… just like Blender 2.91, 2.92. So, as someone who use C4D for years I have some opinions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |